<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser dork</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drewmckinney.net/2008/03/25/browser-dork/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drewmckinney.net/2008/03/25/browser-dork/</link>
	<description>a place for drew mckinney to dot net</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris F.</title>
		<link>http://drewmckinney.net/2008/03/25/browser-dork/#comment-78234</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewmckinney.net/2008/03/25/browser-dork/#comment-78234</guid>
		<description>Mon dieu. Brother, you're worse about updating this place than I am about posting to my LJ.

I gotta say, I've tried the actual Firefox 3 release and... it's ok. Certainly it's better than Firefox has been for a while, but... it's a lot slower than I expected.

And the memory footprint? Yeeesh. My work did a forced upgrade to IE-7 and while I really don't like the aesthetics of it, I've got 3 tabs open in it and my Windoze processes tab on the Task Manager says it's using 3,128K
Firefox has doesn't have any additional tabs open and is at 41,888 K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mon dieu. Brother, you&#8217;re worse about updating this place than I am about posting to my LJ.</p>
<p>I gotta say, I&#8217;ve tried the actual Firefox 3 release and&#8230; it&#8217;s ok. Certainly it&#8217;s better than Firefox has been for a while, but&#8230; it&#8217;s a lot slower than I expected.</p>
<p>And the memory footprint? Yeeesh. My work did a forced upgrade to IE-7 and while I really don&#8217;t like the aesthetics of it, I&#8217;ve got 3 tabs open in it and my Windoze processes tab on the Task Manager says it&#8217;s using 3,128K<br />
Firefox has doesn&#8217;t have any additional tabs open and is at 41,888 K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://drewmckinney.net/2008/03/25/browser-dork/#comment-77569</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewmckinney.net/2008/03/25/browser-dork/#comment-77569</guid>
		<description>WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO UPDATE AGAIN? I come to your site more often than is healthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO UPDATE AGAIN? I come to your site more often than is healthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
